Clinical Case Review Mentoring
A supportive, structured space to think clearly, stay ethical, and practise sustainably.
Case review mentoring provides a space to slow down clinical thinking, explore complexity, and reflect on case management without judgement or pressure to perform.
These sessions support practitioners to deepen clinical reasoning, refine assessment pathways, and build confidence when working with layered and chronic presentations.
Option 1:
Small Group Case Review Mentoring
Monthly group mentoring for health professionals at all stages of practice who want grounded clinical discussion, professional connection, and perspective beyond isolation.
Who This Is For
This mentoring space is designed for practitioners who:
-
Want a safe, collegial space to discuss de-identified cases
-
Value ethical, evidence-informed discussion without dogma
-
Are early-career, mid-career, or established and seeking reflection
-
Work solo, in small clinics, or in regional/remote settings
-
Want reassurance, refinement, or a fresh lens on complex presentations
This is not about being “taught what to do.”
It is about thinking well, together.
Monthly online case review groups
Each 90-minute session includes:
-
Facilitated discussion of submitted de-identified cases
-
Clinical reasoning, pattern recognition, and treatment sequencing
-
Scope, boundaries, and practitioner responsibility
-
Managing uncertainty, complexity, and “grey areas”
-
Learning from each other’s experience, not comparison
Sessions are live on Zoom, recorded, and supported with structure so everyone benefits — whether or not you present a case that month.
Session Format & Commitment
-
Monthly 90-minute live session
-
Maximum 10 participants
-
6-month commitment (continuity matters)
-
Recordings available to members
-
Optional private online space for connection between sessions
- $300 plus GST Investment
Discussion may include:
- Complex chronic and multi-system cases
- Environmental and lifestyle contributors
- Pathology and functional test interpretation
- Clinical reasoning and prioritisation
- Practitioner reflections on managing complexity and aligned within the principles of Naturopathic and Nutritional Medicine.
This is a collegial professional space rather than a teaching seminar. Learning occurs through shared inquiry, not comparison.
Option 2:
1:1 Clinic Case Review Mentoring
For when you need focused, confidential professional reflection.
Overview
This offering is for practitioners who want private, one-to-one space to discuss clinical cases that feel complex, stuck, or ethically nuanced.
It is particularly suited to:
-
Complex chronic disease or multi-layered presentations
- Environmental Health
- Treating people with burnout
-
Cases carrying emotional or professional weight
-
Practitioners working in isolation
-
Moments where clarity matters more than speed
- Supporting practitioner confidence and ethical decision-making
What This Is (and Is Not)
This is:
-
Professional peer-to-peer mentoring
-
A space to explore clinical reasoning and options
-
Support for decision-making, boundaries, and scope
- Interpreting pathology and functional testing appropriately
This is not:
-
Patient care
-
A second opinion or directive treatment plan
-
A replacement for supervision or referral
Format & Commitment
- Intake form and de-identified case summary prior to the session
-
60 minute Zoom session
-
Case-focused discussion
-
Practitioner-led pacing and priorities
-
Follow-up reflection points provided
- $250 plus GST per session (price includes preparation of case & 60 min live zoom session)
For practitioners seeking individualised support or working with particularly complex or sensitive cases.
Sessions are designed to support clarity and professional development, not provide prescriptive treatment plans.
A grounded, ethical approach
Facilitated by Liza Twohill, Naturopath, clinic owner, educator, supervisor, and long-term regional practitioner with over two decades of clinical experience.
Liza brings a calm, systems-based lens to case review — holding both the clinical detail and the human carrying the case.
All mentoring and case review services are delivered within professional scope and align with NHAA guidelines.
They are educational in nature and intended to support practitioner development, reflective practice, and sustainable clinical work.
If you are looking for thoughtful professional support that values depth, integrity, and long-term practice sustainability, these services are designed to meet you where you are.
Frequently Asked Questions
These are some of the questions people most frequently ask us:
Who are these services for?
These services are designed for qualified health professionals who are already in practice and working with real clinical complexity. They are particularly suited to practitioners who value reflective practice, ethical decision-making, and sustainable ways of working over quick fixes or rigid protocols.
Are these services suitable for new graduates?
Early-career practitioners are welcome, particularly if they are already seeing complex cases or navigating the realities of practice ownership or employment.
That said, these services assume a foundational level of clinical training and professional responsibility. They are not introductory education or a substitute for formal supervision, coursework, or regulatory requirements.
Is this clinical supervision?
No.
Mentoring and case review are educational and reflective, not supervisory, therapeutic, or managerial in nature.
You remain fully responsible for your clinical decisions, scope of practice, and client care. These sessions are designed to support your thinking, not direct it.
Will you tell me what to do with my cases?
No.
The intention is not to provide prescriptive treatment plans or definitive answers.
Instead, the focus is on:
- Clarifying clinical reasoning
- Exploring assessment and prioritisation
- Supporting confidence when working with uncertainty
- Reflecting on complexity rather than oversimplifying it
This approach supports long-term clinical growth rather than dependency.
What types of cases are appropriate for case review?
Case review mentoring commonly explores:
- Complex chronic and multi-system presentations
- Environmental and lifestyle contributors to chronic illness
- Interpretation of pathology and functional testing within scope
- Cases involving uncertainty, plateaus, or practitioner fatigue
Cases must be de-identified and discussed within professional and ethical guidelines.
How are the small group case review sessions structured?
Small group sessions are facilitated, time-contained, and intentionally limited in size to support depth of discussion and professional safety.
They are not lectures or webinars. Learning occurs through shared inquiry, respectful dialogue, and collective experience.
A six-month commitment supports continuity, trust, and meaningful clinical development.
Is this appropriate if I am feeling burnt out or questioning my capacity?
Yes, with discernment.
Many practitioners seek mentoring or case review during periods of questioning, fatigue, or professional transition. These services can support reflection and clarity around workload, boundaries, and sustainability.
However, they are not a replacement for personal healthcare, psychological support, or crisis intervention.
Do you work within professional and association guidelines?
Yes.
All mentoring and case review services are delivered within professional scope and aligned with NHAA guidelines and ethical standards.
They are educational in nature and designed to support practitioner development, reflective practice, and professional longevity.
How do I know which option is right for me?
If you value collegial discussion and shared learning, group case review may be appropriate.
If you prefer individual depth, privacy, or have particularly complex cases, 1:1 mentoring or case review may be a better fit.
You are welcome to enquire to discuss suitability before committing.